Iran: Peace Deal With US, Israel Requires Two-Stage Finalization
Iran: Peace Deal With US, Israel Requires Two-Stage Finalization
Iran - TEMPO.CO, Jakarta – The possibility of a lasting peace agreement between Iran, the United States, and Israel has gained momentum, according to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. The minister emphasized that the current diplomatic efforts are the most promising yet, with both Tehran and Washington intensifying their interactions. The optimism comes amid a shift in U.S. policy under President Donald Trump, which has opened new avenues for dialogue. However, Araghchi clarified that a formal treaty remains unsecured, despite the progress made.
Two-Phase Approach to Finalizing the Agreement
In a recent post on social media, dated June 12, 2026, Araghchi outlined a two-step process for concluding the peace deal. He noted that while the agreement is not yet signed, the initial phase would involve the drafting and signing of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to set the foundation for negotiations. The second stage would then address the more complex aspects of the conflict, including military actions and economic terms.
“Progress has never been greater, but no official agreement has been reached yet,” Araghchi stated, as reported by Press TV and Al Jazeera. He highlighted that the ceasefire between Iran and Israel, facilitated by Pakistan on April 8, has provided a critical platform for talks. The MoU, currently under review, would serve as a framework to guide the finalization of the accord.
The foreign minister also mentioned that the first step would focus on halting hostilities. This includes the cessation of Israeli attacks on Lebanon, a key concern for Iran. The second phase would then tackle the Iran nuclear program, the lifting of sanctions, and the distribution of frozen Iranian assets. Araghchi’s comments underscore the delicate balance required to address both immediate security and long-term economic interests.
Compliance and Commitments Remain Central
Iranian Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf echoed Araghchi’s sentiment, stressing that all parties must align on the core elements of the memorandum. In a social media message, he emphasized the importance of fulfilling commitments without hesitation. “There are no ifs, ands, or buts,” Ghalibaf wrote, reinforcing the idea that the agreement’s success hinges on mutual adherence.
The U.S. side, too, has outlined its expectations for the deal. A senior U.S. official confirmed that the peace process is advancing but not fully completed. The official noted that the MoU would incorporate provisions for sanctions relief and the return of Iranian assets. However, immediate compensation is not guaranteed, as the final terms depend on Iran’s compliance with its obligations.
“The initial agreement will include key elements, but further discussions are necessary before full implementation,” the official added. They also referenced Vice President JD Vance’s earlier remarks, stating that the unfreezing of assets would follow an initial deal. “Technical negotiations will begin once the first phase is signed,” the official said, signaling a phased approach to resolving tensions.
This two-stage framework reflects the intricate nature of the negotiations, where security concerns and economic demands must be reconciled. The first step aims to create stability by addressing immediate military threats, while the second stage focuses on institutionalizing long-term cooperation. The inclusion of Oman as a joint overseer of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global trade, adds another layer to the agreement’s strategic significance.
Military Pressure and Diplomatic Outreach
The recent diplomatic push follows a period of heightened military activity between the U.S. and Iran. Two days of direct exchanges, including missile launches and airstrikes, raised questions about the durability of the April 8 ceasefire. Despite these tensions, Trump’s administration has opted for a dual strategy of military deterrence and diplomatic engagement, aiming to secure a lasting peace.
On June 11, Trump announced plans to seize Kharg Island, Iran’s primary oil export facility, as a show of force. However, he later reversed course, citing the growing likelihood of a peace deal. This back-and-forth illustrates the administration’s willingness to balance hardline measures with diplomatic concessions. The official noted that the MoU would serve as a temporary measure to build trust before tackling more contentious issues.
“The threat of military action has been a catalyst for dialogue, but the real progress lies in the negotiations,” the U.S. representative said. They also highlighted the importance of the ceasefire in stabilizing the region and creating space for comprehensive talks. “A long-term agreement is achievable if all parties remain committed,” the official added.
The peace process has been shaped by a combination of pressure and optimism. Trump’s leadership has brought a renewed sense of urgency, with the administration leveraging both military presence and diplomatic outreach. Meanwhile, Iran’s representatives have emphasized the need for firm adherence to the agreement’s terms, particularly regarding sanctions and asset release. The two-stage approach allows for incremental progress, addressing immediate concerns before moving to broader, more permanent resolutions.
Regional Implications and Strategic Partnerships
The inclusion of Oman in the oversight of the Strait of Hormuz highlights the role of regional allies in the agreement. This arrangement not only ensures the waterway’s security but also strengthens Iran’s ties with its Gulf neighbor. Such partnerships are crucial in maintaining stability, especially in a region marked by geopolitical rivalries.
Analysts suggest that the two-stage process could provide a buffer for both sides to adjust to the terms of the deal. The first phase, focused on ceasefire and mutual understanding, may allow for the resolution of immediate disputes. The second stage, addressing Iran’s nuclear program and economic sanctions, requires more extensive cooperation. This structure is designed to prevent the agreement from collapsing under the weight of its more complex provisions.
As the negotiations move forward, the international community watches closely. The deal’s success will depend on Iran’s ability to meet its commitments and the U.S.’s willingness to provide sanctions relief. The phased approach also allows for adjustments based on evolving circumstances, ensuring that the agreement remains flexible and responsive to new challenges.
Staying on Track for a Peaceful Resolution
Despite the recent military exchanges, the two-stage process offers a pathway to sustained peace. By separating the agreement into distinct phases, both sides can address their priorities systematically. The MoU serves as a stepping stone, while the second stage aims to solidify long-term cooperation. This strategy is intended to build confidence and reduce the risk of premature setbacks.
As talks continue, the focus remains on securing the agreement’s core elements. The role of Oman in overseeing the Strait of Hormuz and the inclusion of sanctions relief in the MoU are critical to the deal’s viability. With Trump’s administration prioritizing a swift resolution, the coming weeks will determine whether the two-stage framework can lead to a comprehensive peace agreement.
Read: Iran-US Deal: What Are the Main Sticking Points? Click here to get the latest news updates from Tempo on Google News.