Why Pesta Babi May Qualify as Journalism
Why Pesta Babi May Qualify as Journalism
Why Pesta Babi May Qualify as Journalism - TEMPO.CO, Jakarta – The announcement of Yasinta Moiwend’s scheduled visit to the Jakarta Metropolitan Police headquarters on Friday, May 29, 2026, triggered unease among the Merauke Solidarity Advocacy Team. This group, composed of public-interest lawyers, had anticipated Yasinta’s intent to file a formal complaint against the documentary *Pesta Babi: Kolonialisme di Zaman Kita* (Pig Feast: Colonialism in Our Time). Their initial suspicions centered on the potential use of Indonesia’s Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, which they believed Yasinta might invoke to challenge the film’s portrayal of her identity. However, the exact legal provision she would target remained uncertain.
Legal Provisions and Uncertainty
Tigor Hutapea, a key member of the advocacy team, revealed that the group had prepped multiple legal avenues Yasinta could pursue. Their analysis, based on a testimonial video shared online on Saturday, May 23, 2026, led them to consider the ITE Law as a likely choice. In the video, Yasinta expressed frustration with the documentary’s production team, accusing them of showcasing her image without consent. “We didn’t know which article Mama Yasinta would use,” Tigor stated during a meeting in Tebet, South Jakarta, on June 3. The team’s preparation underscored their awareness of the documentary’s growing influence and its potential to stir controversy within the indigenous community.
Advocacy Team’s Role and Past Collaborations
The Merauke Solidarity Advocacy Team has been instrumental in supporting Yasinta and other members of the Malind indigenous community. Their involvement extends to a significant environmental lawsuit currently being heard at the Jayapura Administrative Court in Papua. This case challenges the construction of a 135-kilometer road, part of a national strategic project (PSN), which has sparked debates about land rights and resource exploitation. Since March 2026, the team has worked closely with the plaintiffs, advocating for their interests against corporate and governmental entities. This ongoing relationship has deepened their understanding of Yasinta’s motivations, particularly her focus on preserving cultural narratives and defending indigenous voices.
Despite their prior collaboration, the team was caught off guard by Yasinta’s decision to file a police report. The complaint targets Dandhy Dwi Laksono, the director of *Pesta Babi*, and Johnny Teddy Wakum, head of the Merauke branch of the Papua Legal Aid Institute. Yasinta, accompanied by attorney T.S. Hamonangan Daulay, submitted the report under Law No. 27/2022 on Personal Data Protection. This law, enacted to safeguard individuals’ digital identities, grants citizens the right to demand transparency from entities that use their data without consent. Yasinta’s choice of this legal framework highlights her emphasis on privacy rights, even as she critiques the documentary’s broader implications.
Implications for Journalism and Indigenous Narratives
The incident has sparked a discussion about the boundaries of journalism and the ethical responsibilities of documentary creators. While *Pesta Babi* is framed as an exploration of colonialism in contemporary contexts, Yasinta argues that her personal data was exploited without her acknowledgment. Her actions challenge the notion that documentary filmmaking automatically qualifies as journalistic work, especially when it involves the use of private information in public discourse. This debate is further complicated by the documentary’s focus on indigenous perspectives, which often become central to national narratives about land and culture.
Yasinta’s complaint also raises questions about the legal mechanisms available to protect indigenous rights in media. By leveraging the Personal Data Protection Law, she positions herself as a advocate for both personal privacy and collective representation. The case could set a precedent for similar disputes, particularly as more indigenous communities seek to control how their stories are told in digital spaces. For the advocacy team, this moment represents a critical juncture in their efforts to balance media exposure with the protection of individual rights.
Meanwhile, the documentary’s production team faces scrutiny over their practices. *Pesta Babi* has been praised for its bold critique of colonial legacies, but Yasinta’s allegations suggest a need for greater accountability in how subjects are portrayed. The film’s use of unverified footage and personal anecdotes has drawn both admiration and criticism, illustrating the dual nature of storytelling as a tool for empowerment and potential exploitation.
Public Reaction and Broader Context
The controversy surrounding *Pesta Babi* has amplified within the Merauke community, where indigenous rights have long been a focal point of activism. Local residents and leaders are divided, with some supporting the film as a necessary exposé of systemic injustices, while others see Yasinta’s complaint as a legitimate defense of her identity and agency. This polarization reflects the broader tensions between media influence and cultural autonomy, as indigenous voices navigate the global stage while maintaining ties to their communities.
As the police report moves forward, legal experts are monitoring the case closely. The Personal Data Protection Law, though relatively new, has already been invoked in various instances to address data misuse in digital media. Yasinta’s decision to pursue this route underscores the law’s relevance in modern journalism, where the line between public interest and individual privacy can blur. Her story, now at the center of a legal and cultural debate, serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in representing marginalized communities through media.
The Merauke Solidarity Advocacy Team, having represented Yasinta in environmental cases, is now playing a pivotal role in this new chapter of her activism. Their legal expertise and deep connection to the indigenous community provide a unique perspective on the allegations. As the case unfolds, it may shape future discussions about the ethical standards of documentary filmmaking in Indonesia, where the intersection of media and politics often determines the success of social movements.
In an interview after submitting the report, Yasinta emphasized the importance of consent in storytelling. “They screened the film without my permission,” she said, underscoring her belief that personal data should be treated with the same care as cultural heritage. This statement, captured in a
tag, highlights her commitment to ensuring that her narrative is not only heard but also respected in its integrity.
The advocacy team remains hopeful that the case will reinforce the rights of indigenous individuals to assert control over their identities in the public sphere, setting a precedent for future legal challenges in media.
As the investigation continues, the incident serves as a microcosm of the broader struggle between free expression and individual rights. Whether *Pesta Babi* will be viewed as a journalistic triumph or a case of data exploitation depends on how the legal system interprets its use of personal information. For Yasinta and her community, the outcome could redefine the relationship between media, advocacy, and the protection of cultural narratives in a rapidly digitizing world.
Read the Complete Story in Tempo English Magazine